2000: Preparing for Trial on SRF’s Remaining Copyright Claims

Before the SRF lawsuit, any advertisement that included Master—his name, picture, even Autobiography of a Yogi—was either from SRF or Ananda. You could tell by the spelling—Paramhansa (Ananda) or Paramahansa (SRF)—who it was. Now, in every new age or yoga magazine, there were advertisements featuring not only Master, but all our line of Gurus. You … Read more

1999: Dharmocracy — Right Action — Is the Key to Success

 “You don’t need rules, if your self-definition is clear,” Swamiji said. His paper, Ananda’s Directions, settled any confusion that might still linger: There is no Ananda without Swami Kriyananda. The most vocal critics had already left. Now there was another smaller wave of departures by those who couldn’t embrace Swamiji’s role as he defined it. … Read more

1992: The Federal Judge Rules in Ananda’s Favor on the Two Most Important Issues in the SRF Lawsuit

In January, Daya Mata responded, “While we feel no ill will, but only love toward you, that love is not blind to the flaws that have put us in opposite positions.” She describes her position, and that of the other Board members, as “following devoutly the many years of counsel and guidance which Gurudev gave … Read more